• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy statement (CA)
    • Cookie policy (CA)
    • Privacy statement (UK)
    • Cookie policy (UK)
    • Privacy statement (US)
    • Cookie Policy (US)
    • Privacy statement (EU)
    • Cookie policy (EU)
    • Disclaimer

TechWalls

Technology News | Gadget Reviews | Tutorials

  • Reviews
  • Tech News
  • Tech Guide
  • Gadget & Apps

Tesla vs. Traditional Dealerships: The Impact of Direct Sales on the Auto Industry

Updated on Jun 21, 2023 by Keffer

Tesla, the electric vehicle manufacturing powerhouse, has become a thorn in the side of the highly lucrative car dealership industry with its unconventional direct sales model. Historically, Americans aren’t known to be hagglers except when it comes to buying cars, a process that is often steeped in drawn-out negotiations. Economists have long been critical of the traditional dealership model, and customers have expressed distaste for it as well. Despite this, the model endures, thanks to state dealership franchise laws that have been in place for decades.

Historical Context: Dealership Laws and Their Evolution

Since the 1930s, car manufacturers have been obliged by law to sell and service their vehicles through franchised dealerships. This system provided automakers with a consistent cash flow for manufacturing new cars, and dealerships could then profit from selling these cars. While these laws were initially implemented to protect small, local businesses from the monopolistic practices of the “Big Three” automakers – General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford – the current automotive landscape looks drastically different.

Presently, many dealership groups are wealthy corporate entities, with the top 10 American dealership groups generating approximately $100 billion in annual revenue. In response to the shift in power dynamics, these dealerships have been fiercely protective of the laws that keep the franchise model in place, arguing that they benefit consumers by offering competitive prices, facilitating test-drives, and simplifying the buying and registration process.

However, critics, including economists and consumers, counter this perspective, claiming that dealerships introduce unnecessary middlemen, employ high-pressure sales tactics, and tack on exorbitant fees. These critics argue that the purported competition among dealerships is undermined by state laws granting dealers exclusive rights to sell specific car brands within certain territories.

Tesla’s Unique Approach: Direct-to-Consumer Model

Tesla, having entered the market in 2013, stands as a glaring exception to this rule in many states. Through a direct-to-consumer model, Tesla has demonstrated that auto manufacturers can sell and service their own vehicles effectively, much to the chagrin of traditional car dealerships. Buyers can view Tesla’s vehicles in showrooms before making purchases online, effectively reducing interactions with salespeople and eliminating haggling.

Unsurprisingly, Tesla’s model was met with resistance from traditional dealerships, sparking legal battles across the country. While the struggles continue, almost half of the states have relaxed their direct sales restrictions for EVs.

Other EV manufacturers, such as Rivian, Lucid, and Polestar, have also adopted direct-sales models, prompting legacy automakers to consider similar strategies for their electric fleets. For example, Ford recently indicated that it might sell its EVs at fixed, non-negotiable prices. Similarly, Mercedes-Benz and BMW have been exploring an “agency” model, where cars can be bought online from the manufacturer and picked up at the dealer, in Europe.

However, these changes are met with resistance from dealership lobbyists, who fear the potential disruption of their business model and have been successful in enforcing laws to protect traditional franchises. Florida’s recent legislation strengthened the ban on direct-to-consumer sales for legacy automakers while providing exceptions for EV startups like Tesla.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Auto Sales

As the US shifts towards electric vehicles, dealerships fear obsolescence and are lobbying to keep legacy automakers in the franchise dealership model. While disliked by many customers, dealerships have been successful in preserving their model through substantial political lobbying and community involvement.

Nonetheless, the direct-to-consumer trend is already happening, and a growing number of states are allowing local sales and service. The question remains whether consumers will have the freedom and convenience to maintain direct relationships with manufacturers locally or if they will have to go to another state for such an experience. Despite resistance from traditional dealerships, the tide of market forces seems unstoppable.

Disclosure: We might earn commission from qualifying purchases. The commission help keep the rest of my content free, so thank you!

Footer

VTOMAN FlashSpeed 1500 Portable Power Station Review

OpenRock S Review – Revolutionizing the World of Earbuds

KEF LS50 Bookshelf Speakers Review: A Sound Decision Over the LS50 Meta

ALLPOWERS SP033 200W Portable Solar Panel Review – Eco-Friendly Energy on the Go

Follow TechWalls

YoutubeFacebookTwitterInstagram

Recent Posts

  • VTOMAN FlashSpeed 1500 Portable Power Station Review
  • OpenRock S Review – Revolutionizing the World of Earbuds
  • AiDot OREiN & Linkind Matter Smart Light Bulb Review
  • OKP L1 Robot Vacuum Cleaner Review – Affordable Robot with LiDAR Navigation

Copyright © 2023 ยท All Rights Reserved

Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional cookies Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}