• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact
  • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy statement (CA)
    • Cookie policy (CA)
    • Privacy statement (UK)
    • Cookie policy (UK)
    • Privacy statement (US)
    • Cookie Policy (US)
    • Privacy statement (EU)
    • Cookie policy (EU)
    • Disclaimer

TechWalls

Technology News | Gadget Reviews | Tutorials

  • Reviews
  • Tech News
  • Tech Guide
  • Gadget & Apps

Why iPhone 5C is not the cheap version iPhone of Apple?

Updated on Oct 6, 2013 by Guest Authors

As the experts say, every company has some ‘unique’ assets in the market which cannot be thrown away just at the sake of cheap marketing and rat-race competition. I believe Apple is the real-time example of this quote.

Before September 10, experts were saying that Apple could’ve built an inexpensive phone under the 5C tag! But now the same experts feel that Apple did a perfect pricing of iPhone 5C. What made them to change their opinion?

The Post-Mortem

Many analysts said Apple could’ve de-speced it more and concentrated on reducing the price of its flagship iPhone devices, something within $300-$400. But here is Apple – always a step ahead of the market threshold and thinking differently. Very few pioneer analysts predicted that Apple will maintain the same pricing as of iPhone 5S. Two weeks back, Apple launched its colourful iPhone 5C with a tag of $549 for the its 16GB model, which is just a iPhone 5S with a new colourful plastic coat and a carrier subsidy.

iphone-5c-cheap

It is obvious, as per the general mindset, that if Apple had reduced iPhone’s price by $100 at least, it would’ve been easy for them to compete against a promising Android market, led by Samsung. This would’ve also helped them to check there shedding of shares in potent Asian markets like India, China and also in other parts of Asia. So, this high-order business of Apple would’ve impressed a deadly effect in the minds of the app developer’s and negate the fact that every tech-geek wants – thriving of one single app ecosystem.

Still, as said by Ben Thompson of Stratechery, Apple followed its patent strategy that has given them billions- maintaining the standards and the quality of the product. IHS disassembles different phones on a regular basis. When they tried to find out the BOM of iPhone 5C, it came around $173.45 for the 16GB model. Without subsidy, if Apple would’ve sold iPhone 5C at $400, still they would’ve had a clear hardware margin of 68%.

But why Apple didn’t reduce the price?

Let’s find out the reasons…

Reason 1 – Lower build quality

Apple never wanted to compromise with the phone’s build quality. If Apple’s iPhone 5C cost was $400, it would’ve felt much more ‘plasticky’ and cheap compared to its previous generations. And a company like them would never want to lose loyal iPhone customers. So to make it sturdy, Apple had put a good quality metal frame under the plastic covering which as per many reviewers gives the phone a solid finishing.

Reason 2 – Poor Specs

Apple would never ever compromise with the specification of its device, may how much its shares are falling in the market. That is what makes Apple a standout. Now, the iPhone 5C offers some outstanding specifications like- 16GB minimum of NAND flash memory, 1GB RAM,1510 mAh 8 megapixel camera, 4G and both 2.4GHz and 5GHz supportive Wi-Fi. If the price was reduced to $400, the specs would’ve reduced to- 8GB NAND flash memory, 512 MB RAM,1250 mAh battery, cheap quality camera, only 3G and only 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. This much compromise Apple would never make in its specs, may what happen.

Final Reason – Apple’s class and quality

Even after the backlash from Chinese media, Apple could’ve slashed the price around $400 but they didn’t. Just because many companies are now settled in China and exporting their products from there. But Apple is not yet looking at producing cheap products at cheap prices for a hungry market.

May Android dominate today’s smartphone world, still its Apple’s product standard and brand value that adds up another $149 to the expected market price of iPhone 5C. As of today, I don’t see Apple eyeing a release of a less-priced iPhone in the recent future only because of one reason- its brand quality and elegance -seeds sown by none other than our very own Steve Jobs.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. The commission help keep the rest of my content free, so thank you!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Aulia says

    Oct 3, 2013 at 10:08 am

    It’s sad when their stock went down because iPhone 5c was not as cheap as expected. Problem is, Apple never said anything that they would make a cheap iPhone. The rumours and leaks were destroying the image :)

    Reply
  2. Ramen Gomez says

    Oct 4, 2013 at 1:30 am

    Thank you for visiting Techwalls and taking interest in our articles.
    Yes Apple faced a huge fall in the stock market after 5C’s launch.But as i said before, it hardly matters when its a big-shot like Apple. It is obvious that they will have some beta plan ready to defend these situations in future.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Hohem iSteady Mobile Plus Gimbal Stabilizer Review – Upgrade Your Phone Videography On A Budget

Airdog X5 Air Purifier Review – Is TPA Better Than HEPA Filter?

Welock Touch43 Fingerprint Smart Lock Review

HeyChy Deep Tissue Massage Gun Review

Follow TechWalls

YoutubeFacebookTwitterInstagram

Recent Posts

  • Secure Your Home With SECURAM
  • C3STROM ASTRO PRO – An E-Bike with Classic Rebel Motorcycle and Modern Ride
  • Bluetti AC500 & B300S Hit Canada Market During 2023 New Year Sale
  • Hohem iSteady Mobile Plus Gimbal Stabilizer Review – Upgrade Your Phone Videography On A Budget

Copyright © 2023 · All Rights Reserved

Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional cookies Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}